Scientific Experiences in Mechanical Engineering

Original Research Articles

Mechanical and FTIR Characterization of Hybrid Composites Reinforced with Coconut Coir Fiber and Pine Fruit Peel Powder

Nasmi Herlina Sari , Salman , Pandri Pandiatmi , Muhammad Nabil Fadhlurrohman Rivlan , Catalin Iulian Pruncu

Abstract

This research looks into the tensile, impact, and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) characteristics of hybrid composites reinforced using alkali-treated coconut coir fibers and pine fruit peel powder in an epoxy resin matrix. Coconut coir fibers were extracted using a four-day water retting method and then treated with 3 wt.% NaOH for 2 h to increase fiber-matrix interfacial adhesion. The volume fractions of coconut coir fibers (CF) (5%, 10%, and 15%) and pine fruit peel powder (SP) (10%, 20%, and 30%) were varied to form hybrid composites. The CF5/SP10 composite demonstrated the maximum tensile strength (25.61 MPa) and impact strength (46.5 kJ/m²) in the study. The CF15/SP20 composite has the highest modulus of elasticity (1.46 GPa). Increasing the fiber and filler contents beyond the optimal level often decreased mechanical performance, which may be associated with reinforcement agglomeration, insufficient matrix wetting, and the formation of stress concentration sites. FTIR examination revealed the existence of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and epoxy functional groups. The lower intensity of hydroxyl-related absorption bands suggested potential improvement in fiber–matrix compatibility following alkali treatment. These studies show that coconut coir fiber and pine fruit peel powder can be used as sustainable reinforcements for lightweight engineering composites.

Keywords

Coconut coir fiber; Pine fruit peel powder; Hybrid composite; Tensile strength; Impact strength

References

  1. N. Kumar, P. Rawat, and R. K. Kandasami, “Enhancing the characteristics of natural coir fiber yarns using biopolymer for textile reinforced cementitious composites,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 470, no. January, p. 140427, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140427.
  2. A. Aziz and M. H. Pulak, “Development and comprehensive analysis of eco-friendly epoxy composites reinforced with jute, coir, and oil palm fibers,” Hybrid Advances, vol. 12, no. December 2025, p. 100604, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.hybadv.2026.100604.
  3. V. Goyat, G. Ghangas, S. Sirohi, A. Kumar, and J. Nain, “A review on mechanical properties of coir based composites,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 62, pp. 1738–1745, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.252.
  4. T. Zhang, Z. Gao, D. Zeng, and Y. Wang, “Integrating coconut processing residues into sustainable food systems: technological pathways towards a circular bioeconomy,” Food Research International, vol. 232, no. 8, p. 118914, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2026.118914.
  5. K. M. F. Hasan, “A state-of-the-art review on coir fiber-reinforced biocomposites,” RSC Advances, vol. 11, pp. 10548–10571, 2021, doi: 10.1039/d1ra00231g.
  6. J. E. Ribeiro, H. Lopes, and J. Rocha, “Mechanical Characterization of Eco-Friendly Composites: Green Epoxy Resin Reinforced with Coir Fibers,” Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 77, pp. 300–307, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2026.01.039.
  7. Dandapani, K. Devendra, Revennasiddappa, and S. Girish, “Thermal properties of epoxy nanoclay composite materials,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2070, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2070/1/012171.
  8. S. C. Das, S. C. Das, M. R. A. Sayeed, and M. M. K. S. Jahan, “Analysis of Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Hybrid FRP Composites with Short Jute , Coir and Glass Fibers – Effects of Different Fiber Loading and Waste Valorization,” Materials Circular Economy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s42824-025-00197-2.
  9. A. Fitri, M. Y. Siregar, Q. Aini, W. S. Sipahutar, and F. F. Mubina, “Effect of Coconut and Sugarcane Fiber Volume Fraction Variations on the Tensile Properties of Epoxy Matrix Composites,” Jurnal Permadi : Perancangan, Manufaktur, Material dan Energi, vol. 7, no. 01 SE-Articles, pp. 105–113, doi: 10.52005/permadi.v7i01.192.
  10. S. S, A. S. R. Arjun Siva, and K. Balan, “Valorisation of waste short coir fibres in needle felt polymer composites: Development, performance evaluation and optimisation,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 534, no. May, p. 146814, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.146814.
  11. C. E. Okafor, L. C. Kebodi, J. Kandasamy, M. May, and I. E. Ekengwu, “Properties and performance index of natural fiber reinforced cross-ply composites made from Dioscorea alata stem fibers,” Composites Part C: Open Access, vol. 7, pp. 1–14, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100213.
  12. [N. H. Sari, E. D. Sulistyowati, Suteja, and M. Zulfadli, “Bio-composites from Nicotiana tabacum stems waste: Exploring cellulose powder content and its impact on physical, mechanical, and thermal properties,” Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, vol. 12, p. 101262, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2025.101262.
  13. Ö. Süfer et al., “Areca nut husk lignocellulosic fibers: A sustainable alternative to synthetic textiles,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 221, no. August, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.113531.
  14. A. K. Singh et al., “Eco-friendly sisal, basalt, and recycled nylon fibers-reinforced polypropylene composites: A step towards sustainable developments,” Next Materials, vol. 8, no. July, p. 100906, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100906.
  15. T. T. V. Ha, N. M. Viet, V. T. Quan, and N. T. L. Huong, “Novel Fe3O4-modified biochar generated from rice husk: a sustainable strategy for strengthening lead absorption in wastewater,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 21, no. 15, pp. 9677–9686, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13762-024-05626-4.
  16. E. Syafri, Jamaluddin, N. H. Sari, M. Mahardika, P. Amanda, and R. A. Ilyas, “Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from Agave gigantea by chemical-mechanical treatment,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 200, pp. 25–33, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.12.111.
  17. K. King et al., “Advances in Bamboo Science Development and evaluation of bamboo nanocellulose PVDF mixed matrix membrane for water purification,” Advances in Bamboo Science, vol. 11, p. 100134, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.bamboo.2025.100134.
  18. S. Kathiresan and O. Meenakshisundaram, “Effect of alkali treated and untreated cellulose fibers and human hair on FTIR and tensile properties for composite material applications,” SN Applied Sciences, vol. 4, no. 74, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42452-022-04946-9.
  19. M. Asrofi, H. Abral, A. Kasim, and A. Pratoto, “XRD and FTIR Studies of Nanocrystalline Cellulose from Water Hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes) Fiber,” Journal of Metastable and Nanocrystalline Materials, vol. 29, pp. 9–16, 2017, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/jmnm.29.9.
  20. J. C. Bullen et al., “Spectroscopic ( XAS , FTIR ) investigations into arsenic adsorption onto TiO 2 / Fe 2 O 3 composites : Evaluation of the surface complexes , speciation and precipitation predicted by modelling,” Results in Surfaces and Interfaces, vol. 9, no. 100084, pp. 1–15, 2022.
  21. R. Caban, “FTIR-ATR spectroscopic , thermal and microstructural studies on polypropylene-glass fiber composites,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1264, no. 133181, pp. 1–8, 2022.
  22. E. M. Groves, A. L. Farnsworth, J. Vongsvivut, M. Ibrahim, and A. D. M. Charles, “Probing laser-damaged carbon fibre-reinforced polymer composites using synchrotron ATR-FTIR microspectroscopy,” Composites Part A, vol. 204, no. 109640, pp. 1–10, 2026.
  23. D. Matykiewicz, M. Barczewski, M. S. Mousa, M. R. Sanjay, and S. Siengchin, “Impact strength of hybrid epoxy–basalt composites modified with mineral and natural fillers,” ChemEngineering, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.3390/chemengineering5030056.
  24. B. Istana et al., “Impact of alkali treatment on the mechanical, acoustic, and morphological characteristics of sustainable oil palm frond fiber composites,” South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 54, pp. 475–483, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.sajce.2025.09.004.