Scientific Experiences in Mechanical Engineering

Articles

Effects of Different Seatbelt Reminders on Seatbelt Wearing Rates: Malaysian Case Study

Juffrizal Karjanto , Mohd Fauzi Ahmad , Mohd Asri Azizul , Nurulhana Borhan , Luqmanul Hakim Che Hussein

Published
2 January 2027

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2027): Issue in Progress
Pages e5.1-12

DOI

Open Access
Download PDF
Share

Abstract

This study examines the degree to which seatbelt reminder devices work to encourage car occupants across multiple seating positions to use seatbelts. Three vehicle conditions were tested using a within- and between-subject experimental design, including visual reminder only (Perodua Myvi), intermittent reminder (Hyundai Creta), and incessant warning (Perodua Ativa). Participants completed pre and post experiment questionnaires and were observed across different laps while driving or riding in selected vehicles. A total of 35 participants completed the on-road experiment involving three seatbelt reminder configurations: visual reminder only, intermittent auditory reminder, and incessant auditory reminder. The results showed no statistically significant differences in seatbelt wearing rates among the reminder conditions across the evaluated seating positions (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, enhanced reminder systems demonstrated a tendency toward higher seatbelt compliance than visual-only reminders. The findings suggest that participant selection based on self-reported behaviour and the relatively small sample size may have limited the statistical sensitivity of the experiment.

Keywords

Seatbelt reminders; Malaysian driver; Seatbelt wearing rate

References

  1. [1] D. G. Kidd and S. O’Malley, “Increasing seat belt use in the United States by promoting and requiring more effective seat belt reminder systems,” Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 24, no. sup1, pp. S80–S87, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2134730.
  2. [2] National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Occupant Crash Protection, Seat Belt Reminder Systems, Controls and Displays,” Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC, 2025. doi: 10.6028/2024-30340.
  3. [3] A. Soica and C. Gheorghe, “A Review of Seatbelt Technologies and Their Role in Vehicle Safety,” 2025. doi: 10.3390/app15105303.
  4. [4] Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, “Automakers quickly improve seat belt reminders in response to IIHS ratings,” Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.iihs.org/news/detail/automakers-quickly-improve-seat-belt-reminders-in-response-to-iihs-ratings
  5. [5] D. G. Kidd, A. T. McCartt, and N. J. Oesch, “Attitudes toward seat belt use and in-vehicle technologies for encouraging belt use.,” Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 2014, doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.792111.
  6. [6] Z. Zou, A. Khan, M. Lwin, F. Alnajjar, and O. Mubin, “Investigating the impacts of auditory and visual feedback in advanced driver assistance systems: a pilot study on driver behavior and emotional response,” Frontiers in Computer Science, vol. 6-2024, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2024.1499165.
  7. [7] M. Shimamura, M. Yamazaki, and G. Fujita, “Method to evaluate the effect of safety belt use by rear seat passengers on the injury severity of front seat occupants,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 5–17, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.05.003.
  8. [8] S. Kuppa, J. Saunders, and O. Fessahaie, “Rear Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes,” 2005, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, United States. [Online]. Available: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-01/esv/esv19/05-0212-O.pdf
  9. [9] J. Heo, M. G. Cho, and T. Kim, “Optimization of Occupant Restraint System Using Machine Learning for THOR-M50 and Euro NCAP,” 2024. doi: 10.3390/machines12010074.
  10. [10] M. Eskandar et al., “Designing a Reminders System in Highly Automated Vehicles’ Interfaces for Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment,” Frontiers in Future Transportation, vol. Volume 3-2022, 2022, doi: 10.3389/ffutr.2022.854553.
  11. [11] B. Suffoletto, M. L. Pacella-LaBarbara, J. Huber, M. K. Delgado, and C. McDonald, “Effectiveness of a Text Message Intervention Promoting Seat Belt Use Among Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.,” JAMA Network Open, vol. 5, no. 9, p. e2231616, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31616.
  12. [12] F. Hu, “Robust Seatbelt Detection and Usage Recognition for Driver Monitoring Systems,” in AAAI 2022 Workshop on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems Engineering, 2022. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.00810.
  13. [13] Drive in Malaysia, “Importance of Seat Belts and its Awareness among Malaysian Drivers.” [Online]. Available: https://driveinmalaysia.com/blog/2022/importance-of-seat-belts-and-its-awareness-among-malaysian-drivers/
  14. [14] Bernama, “Only 11% of passengers buckle up at the back, says Miros,” Free Malaysia Today, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2021/03/11/only-11-of-passengers-buckle-up-at-the-back-says-miros
  15. [15] A. Lie, M. Krafft, A. Kullgren, and C. Tingvall, “Intelligent seat belt reminders-do they change driver seat belt use in Europe?,” Traffic Injury Prevention, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 446–449, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1080/15389580802149690.
  16. [16] D. G. Kidd and J. Singer, “Consumer acceptance of enhanced seat belt reminders, a gearshift interlock, or different speed-limiting interlocks to encourage seat belt use following a brief hands-on experience,” Safety Science, vol. 120, pp. 617–624, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.039.
  17. [17] P. Kielty, M. S. Dilmaghani, W. Shariff, C. Ryan, J. Lemley, and P. Corcoran, “Neuromorphic Driver Monitoring Systems: A Proof-of-Concept for Yawn Detection and Seatbelt State Detection Using an Event Camera,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 96363–96373, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3312190.
  18. [18] U. Ju, L. L. Chuang, and C. Wallraven, “Acoustic Cues Increase Situational Awareness in Accident Situations: A VR Car-Driving Study,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3281–3291, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.3035374.
  19. [19] A. A. Stone et al., “A population-based investigation of participation rate and self-selection bias in momentary data capture and survey studies,” Current Psychology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 2074–2090, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04426-2.
  20. [20] Z. Zou et al., “A preliminary simulator study on exploring responses of drivers to driving system reminders on four stimuli in vehicles,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 4009, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87571-x.
  21. [21] M. U. Farooq, A. Ahmed, and T. U. Saeed, “A statistical analysis of the correlates of compliance and defiance of seatbelt use,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 77, pp. 117–128, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.12.008.
  22. [22] D. G. Kidd and J. Singer, “The effects of persistent audible seat belt reminders and a speed-limiting interlock on the seat belt use of drivers who do not always use a seat belt,” Journal of Safety Research, vol. 71, pp. 13–24, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.005.
Article Metrics
20
Views
5
Downloads

SCITE

DIMENSIONS

Publication Information
Published 2 January 2027
Section Articles
Copyright Copyright (c) 2027 Juffrizal Karjanto, Mohd Fauzi Ahmad, Mohd Asri Azizul, Nurulhana Borhan, Luqmanul Hakim Che Hussein (Author)
License Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Keywords
  • Seatbelt reminders
  • Malaysian driver
  • Seatbelt wearing rate