Publication Ethics & Malpractice Statement
Table of content
Statement | Allegation of Research Misconduct | Complaints and Appeals | Ethical Oversight | Duties of Editors | Duties of Authors | Duties of Reviewers
Statement
All journals published by AIS Indonesia are peer-reviewed and committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics by taking all possible measures against publication malpractice. This statement outlines the ethical responsibilities of all parties involved in publishing articles in these journals, including authors, the chief editor, associate editors, the editorial board, reviewers, and the publisher. Based on the COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors, we are dedicated to publishing original work of intellectual value in the best possible form and to the highest standards. We expect the same standards of honesty, originality, and fair treatment from our authors, as well as fairness, objectivity, and confidentiality from our editors and reviewers. We are committed to following best practices in ethics, addressing misconduct and retractions, and providing legal review when necessary.
Allegation of Research Misconduct
Research misconduct includes fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, and plagiarism in the production, performance, review, or reporting of research and the writing of articles. If authors are found to have engaged in research misconduct or other serious misconduct involving an article published in our journal, the Editor is responsible for ensuring the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.
In cases of suspected misconduct, the Editor and Editorial Board will follow COPE best practices for handling complaints and resolving issues fairly. This process includes an investigation by the Editor. Manuscripts found to contain such misconduct will be rejected. If a published paper is found to contain misconduct, a retraction will be issued and linked to the original article.
The first step involves determining the validity of the allegation and assessing whether it meets the definition of research misconduct. This step also includes identifying any conflicts of interest involving those making the allegation.
If scientific misconduct or other substantial misconduct appears likely, the allegation is shared with the corresponding author, who, on behalf of all co-authors, is asked to respond in detail. After evaluating the response, additional expert review, such as by a statistical reviewer, may be requested. In cases where misconduct is unlikely, additional clarification or analysis, published as a letter to the editor including a correction notice may be sufficient.
We will conduct a proper and thorough investigation of allegations of scientific misconduct. Ultimately, authors, journals, and publishers have a shared obligation to ensure the accuracy of the scientific record. By responding to concerns about misconduct and taking appropriate action, such as issuing corrections, retractions with replacement, and full retractions, AIS Indonesia upholds its responsibility to maintain the validity and integrity of the scientific record, as outlined in the Plagiarism Policy and the R-W-C Policy.
Complaints and Appeals
AIS Indonesia has a clear procedure for handling complaints against the journal, Editorial Staff, Editorial Board, or Publisher. The complaints will be clarified to the respected person concerning the case of the complaint. The scope of complaints includes anything related to the journal business process, i.e. editorial process, found citation manipulation, unfair editor/reviewer, peer-review manipulation, etc. The complaint cases will be processed according to COPE guidelines.
Ethical Oversight
If the research involves chemicals, humans, animals, procedures, or equipment with any inherent hazards, the author must identify these in the manuscript to comply with ethical guidelines for research involving animals and human subjects. If applicable, authors must provide formal ethical clearance from the relevant association or legal organization. If the research involves confidential data or business/marketing practices, the authors should explicitly address how this data or information will be securely managed or, if necessary, concealed.
To ensure best publication practices, AIS Indonesia defines the duties and responsibilities of Editors, Authors, and Reviewers, as described below.
Duties of Editor
Publication Decisions
The editors ensure that all submitted manuscripts being considered for publication undergo peer-review by at least two reviewers who are experts in the field. The Principal Editor is responsible for deciding which of the manuscripts submitted to the journal will be published, based on the validation of the work in question, its importance to researchers and readers, the reviewers’ comments, and such legal requirements as are currently in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The chief editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair Play
Editors evaluate submitted manuscripts exclusively based on their academic merit (importance, originality, study’s validity, clarity) and their relevance to the journal’s scope, without regard to the author’s race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, citizenship, religious belief, political philosophy or institutional affiliation. Decisions to edit and publish are not determined by the policies of governments or any other agencies outside of the journal itself. The Principal Editor has full authority over the entire editorial content of the journal and the timing of publication of that content.
Confidentiality
The editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
The Editors will not use unpublished information disclosed in a submitted manuscript for their research purposes without the author’s explicit written consent. Privileged information or ideas obtained by editors as a result of handling the manuscript will be kept confidential and not used for their advantage. Editors will recuse themselves from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships/connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers; instead, they will ask another member of the editorial board to handle the manuscript.
Management of unethical behavior (s)
The editors, together with the publisher(s), should take rationally responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented regarding a submitted manuscript or published article. Every reported act of unethical publishing behavior will be looked into, even if it is discovered years after publication. For this reason, MESI has legal experts in the field of Intellectual Property rights on the Ethics Advisory Board.
Duties of Authors
Reporting Standards
Authors of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed and the results, followed by an objective discussion of the significance of the work. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Review articles should be accurate, objective, and comprehensive, while editorial ‘opinion’ or perspective pieces should be identified as such. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Data access and retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, should be prepared to provide public access, and should, in any event, be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from 'passing off' another's paper as the author's paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another's paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. We will check each manuscript using a plagiarism checker to ensure the originality of the article. Furthermore, each submitted article should be accompanied by a letter of statement from the author(s) stating that the article is free from plagiarism.
Multiple, redundant, or concurrent publication
Papers describing essentially the same research should not be published in more than one journal or primary publication. Hence, authors should not submit for consideration a manuscript that has already been published in another journal. Submission of a manuscript concurrently to more than one journal is unethical publishing behavior and unacceptable.
Acknowledgment of sources
Authors should ensure that they have properly acknowledged the work of others, and should also cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately (from the conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties) must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Authors should not use information obtained in the course of providing confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications unless they have obtained the explicit written permission of the author(s) of the work involved in these services.
Authorship of the paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where others have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, the author must promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, the author must promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.
Hazards and human or animal subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. The authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.
For human subjects, the author should ensure that the work described has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans.
Declaration of competing interests
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could be viewed as inappropriately influencing (bias) their work. All sources of financial support for the conduct of the research and/or preparation of the article should be disclosed, as should the role of the sponsor(s), if any, in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. If the funding source(s) had no such involvement then this should be stated. The author must declare competing interests in the manuscript/paper template.
Image integrity
It is not acceptable to enhance, obscure, move, remove, or introduce a specific feature within an image. Adjustments of brightness, contrast, or color balance are acceptable if and as long as they do not obscure or eliminate any information present in the original. Manipulating images for improved clarity is accepted, but manipulation for other purposes could be seen as scientific ethical abuse and will be dealt with accordingly. Authors should comply with any specific policy for graphical images applied by the relevant journal, e.g. providing the original images as supplementary material with the article, or depositing these in a suitable repository.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgment of sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.